In a potentially seismic shift for global football, FIFA has confirmed it will review a proposal to expand the 2030 World Cup to a staggering 64 teams, a move that would coincide with the tournament’s centenary. This revelation, following a FIFA Council meeting on March 5, 2025, has ignited discussions about the future of the world’s most prestigious sporting event.
The 2030 World Cup, already groundbreaking in its multi-continental format spanning Morocco, Spain, Portugal, Argentina, Paraguay, and Uruguay, could see a dramatic increase in participating nations.
I’ve witnessed many changes in the sporting world, but this proposal, if implemented, would be one of the most significant.
“A proposal to analyse a 64-team FIFA World Cup to celebrate the centenary of the FIFA World Cup in 2030 was spontaneously raised by a FIFA Council member in the ‘miscellaneous’ agenda item near the end of the FIFA Council meeting held on March 5 2025,” a FIFA spokesperson confirmed to Reuters.
The proposal, reportedly put forth by Ignacio Alonso, a delegate from Uruguay, was met with “stunned silence,” according to the New York Times. This reaction underscores the sheer scale of the potential change, which would further enlarge a tournament already set to expand from 32 to 48 teams for the 2026 edition in North America.
For smaller footballing nations, the prospect of participating in a 64-team World Cup offers an unprecedented opportunity. It’s a chance to dream, to inspire, and to potentially rewrite their footballing history. For fans, it means more matches, more excitement, and a truly global celebration of the sport. However, the logistical and financial implications are immense.
Read Also: Nigeria Seeks $1.1 Billion to Power Rural Communities with Renewable Mini-Grids
As the New York Times reported, “FIFA was likely to be guided by financial and political benefits as much as sporting ones when it came to taking a decision on the matter.” In essence, while the sporting merit is a crucial consideration, the economic and political realities cannot be ignored. The financial gains from an expanded tournament, including increased broadcast revenue and sponsorship deals, are substantial. Furthermore, the political capital derived from including more nations in the global spectacle is undeniable.
“Mr. Infantino … described the proposal as an interesting one that should be analysed more closely,” the New York Times added, according to “four people with direct knowledge of the discussions.” This acknowledgment suggests that FIFA is open to exploring the feasibility of a 64-team tournament, despite the logistical challenges it presents.
The current geopolitical climate also adds to the complexity. A 64 team world cup could be seen as a way to increase global unity, or it could be seen as a way to dilute the quality of the tournament. It is a very complex issue.
The implications of such an expansion are far-reaching. Issues surrounding infrastructure, scheduling, and the overall quality of play will need to be meticulously addressed. The existing multi-continental format already presents logistical hurdles; a 64-team tournament would amplify these challenges exponentially.
As we move forward, the world will be watching closely as FIFA undertakes its analysis. The decision will not only shape the 2030 World Cup but also set a precedent for future tournaments. Whether this bold proposal will ultimately come to fruition remains to be seen.
